How historically accurate is the film brave heart? braw heart is a film set during the Scottish wars of independence. It stars the Australian actor Mel Gibson as William Wallace. In this essay I moderate alone discuss how accurate this film is, by analysing a fact event show in the film the scrap of greatest(prenominal) bridge, I will discuss the people, the wearing and armour, weapons the battle overlay and the tactics. I will comp argon with genuine historical facts. In my opinion brave heart doesnt make a great deal sense its meant to be about the battle of sterling(prenominal) bridge but thither is no bridge! in that location was no Andrew Murray The weapon was completely wrong for Scotland there were non many swords as only very rich detainment had them, the spears are nowhere near the right height they are meant to be three times the height men, as well as they would non wear had wooden poles they would of used spears in the film Scottish had we apons such(prenominal) as daggers and pitch forks that in any case didnt happen. The cloaffair was wrong as the Scottish didnt wear plaid because it wasnt invented!

In the film the Scottish people were sort of scruffy and wore a kilt and tartan shirts with leather belts and the English army were very smartly dressed in chainmail, metal plate armour (that also wasnt invented) and disfranchised metal hats. in the veritable war both sides wore relatively the same thing a hard hat that looked rather like a bucket with the count taken of, leather or wildcat skin boots, they also wore chainmail vests under JACK S that were cloth shirts stuffed with sheep ! woollen to stop disturb from weapons, The film also had the scots faces were particolored with a saltire which didnt happen in the real war. They also wouldnt have flashed to the English!!!If you want to amount a full moon essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.